A matter of time
Exploring the time it takes to govern in schools and trusts.
This report sheds crucial light on the time commitment required of dedicated volunteers who play a vital role in shaping the future of our schools and, by extension, our society.
It challenges us to rethink our approach to school and trust governance, to find ways to streamline processes without compromising on quality, and to ensure that those who give so generously of their time are adequately supported and recognised.
Research overview
'Time-use' diaries were completed by 56 governors and trustees over four weeks across a mix of school types, phases and governance roles. Data was self-reported and was reliant on participants recording their time use accurately. Despite this, it is possible to draw meaningful conclusions from the data.
This study provides an up-to-date, quantitative evaluation of the time commitment of governors and trustees. This builds on ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ's existing qualitative research and reveals insights on an area that is rarely reported on.
Key findings
- Those in non-chairing roles spent 15.8 hours (or 2.1 working days per month, where a working day is 7.5 hours) on their governance role across four weeks. This compares to 21.6 hours (or 2.9 days per month) for those in a chairing role.
- Those chairing (both chairs and vice chairs) in maintained schools spent over double the time that non-chairs did.
- Single academy trust (SAT) trustees spent the most time on their governance role out of all board types at nearly 3.5 working days per month. Meanwhile, maintained school governors spent just over 3 days. Multi academy trust (MAT) trustees spent 2.7 days and local governors in a MAT the least at 1.8 days.
- Those governing in secondary settings spent more time governing than those in primary settings – especially true for those chairing.
- The average full governing board meeting was 2.25 hours and an average committee meeting lasted 1.7 hours – a total of 236 hours or 16% of all diary time.
- Exceptional events like Ofsted, academisation, and headteacher recruitment significantly increased total time in many diaries.
- Administration and reading time were the top two activities reported overall (in terms of activities recorded by most participants and taking the most time).
- Taking part in training and development features in the top five activities reported (recorded by most participants and taking the most time).
- Alongside training and development, operational activities were the third most time-consuming reported in the diaries, adding an average of 1.6 hours’ time burden.
External and self-review packages
In order to realise your board’s potential for continuous improvement, ¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ recommend having an external review of governance every three years, and an annual self-review. Our online self-evaluation tools and external review packages are here to support with this process.
Related content
-
Guidance
-
Research
-
Research
-
Research
-
Guidance
-
Guidance
-
Tools & templates
-
Guidance
-
Guidance
-
Guidance
-
Research
-
Guidance
-
ResearchUpdated: 03/07/2017Governing board evaluation
Defining and collecting school governance quality metrics
-
E-learning
-
E-learning
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Consultancy
-
Webinar
-
NewsUpdated: 21/06/2024Governing board evaluation
¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ Unveils Pioneering Report on the State of Governance in England's Schools and Trusts
-
BlogUpdated: 21/06/2024Governing board evaluation
The professional verdict on school and trust governance
-
Governing Matters
-
Blog
-
Blog
-
Governing Matters
-
NewsUpdated: 08/09/2023Wellbeing
Annual Governance Survey 2023 reveals worrying trends in behaviour and safeguarding
-
Blog
-
Blog
-
Blog
-
NewsUpdated: 14/07/2023Finance & resources
Balancing budgets is getting harder as boards make known their dissatisfaction on government performance
-
News
-
Webinar
-
NewsUpdated: 03/07/2023Latest updates
¾«Æ·SMÔÚÏßӰƬ responds to Ofqual's letter to governors and trustees
-
Webinar